How long will humans be needed for translation?

Breaking news from the markets: How long will humans be needed for translation? Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Google's translation service handles one trillion words per monthByJohn LaurensonBusiness reporter, Reporting fromParisPublished14 October 2026"Il pleut des cordes," say the French when it's raining hard. "It's raining ropes," is the direct translation.

It's the kind of idiom which can trip up an AI translator. "You can imagine the dilemma this throws AI into," says François Yvon, a research director specialised in automatic translation with the French National Centre for Scientific Research CNRS. He says a well-trained system will know that ropes are not literally falling from the sky and use the English phrase "it's raining cats and dogs".

Economic Details

"But is it going to find the equivalent when it's translating into Indonesian? A comment on the weather is pretty low-risk, but more and more translation is being done by machines, and on topics with higher stakes than the weather. In April, Google said people are now translating, external one trillion words a month with Google Translate.

That doesn't count the others: DeepL, Microsoft, Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, not to mention made-to-measure corporate translation systems. Direct sales of machine translation, external (i. outside general AI subscriptions) were worth an estimated $1.

4bn (£1bn) last year. Image source, Jonathan ZimmermannImage caption, AI translation is the "right call" in many cases says Jonathan Zimmermann"For plenty of use cases, raw AI translation is now the right call: multiplying your costs by 100 to catch the last few percent of errors isn't rational if you're translating internal documents or product listings," says Jonathan Zimmermann, founder of OKA (Open Knowledge Association), a Swiss non-profit that translates Wikipedia articles into other languages. "For an encyclopedia it's different.

Analyst Views

Wikipedia runs on trust. A wrong fact can sit there for years and get cited by journalists and AI systems," he says. With more than 10,000 published pieces, mostly into Spanish, Portuguese and English, OKA is, Zimmerman says, the single largest contributor of translated articles to the collaborative online encyclopedia.

Which is something it absolutely could not have become without AI. "Translating 10,000 articles the traditional way would cost millions. In our process, the AI produces the draft, then a human translator checks every sentence," he explains.

But that human input is required less and less. "The machine output is now good enough that skipping the human entirely has become a serious option, and a real temptation across the industry. Two or three years ago, with tools like DeepL, our translators still rewrote a good chunk of every draft.

Economists are analysing what the news means for the markets.