ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers full of AI slop

A striking development has emerged in artificial intelligence. Science SciencePosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. FollowSee All Science AI AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. FollowSee All AI News NewsPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

FollowSee All NewsArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers full of AI slopLeaving AI prompts or other ‘incontrovertible evidence’ will make it harder to use the site going forward. Leaving AI prompts or other ‘incontrovertible evidence’ will make it harder to use the site going forward. by Jay Peters Jay PetersSenior ReporterPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Technical Details

FollowSee All by Jay PetersMay 15, 2026, 8:38 PM UTC Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge, Getty Images Jay Peters Jay PetersPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. FollowSee All by Jay Peters is a senior reporter covering technology, gaming, and more. He joined The Verge in 2019 after nearly two years at Techmeme.

ArXiv, a popular platform for preprint academic research, is taking a new step to attempt to reduce the volume of papers that include AI slop. If a paper has “incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation,” such as hallucinated references or “meta-comments” left by an LLM, authors will be banned from ArXiv for a year, according to Thomas Dietterich, ArXiv’s section chair of its computer science section. Future ArXiv submissions will also have to be accepted at “a reputable peer-reviewed venue.

”Here’s what he said on X:Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name as an author of a paper, each author takes full responsibility for all its contents, irrespective of how the contents were generated. If generative AI tools generate inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content, and that output is included in scientific works, it is the responsibility of the author(s). We have recently clarified our penalties for this.

Industry Implications

If a submission contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation, this means we can’t trust anything in the paper. The penalty is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue. Examples of incontrovertible evidence: hallucinated references, meta-comments from the LLM (“here is a 200 word summary; would you like me to make any changes?

”; “the data in this table is illustrative, fill it in with the real numbers from your experiments”)Authors can appeal ban decisions, Dietterich told 404Media.

This advance offers important signals about the future of the sector, and the tech world is watching closely.