
Morgan Stanley and Charles Schwab are rushing into crypto: what do they see coming?
The cumulative net inflows of US-traded spot Bitcoin ETFs has reached roughly $59.7 billion, with BlackRock's IBIT alone holding $66.7 billion in assets. Morgan Stanley and Charles Schwab are now pushing direct crypto...
Bitcoin 1 Minute
A notable development has hit the crypto markets. The cumulative net inflows of US-traded spot Bitcoin ETFs has reached roughly $59. 7 billion, with BlackRock's IBIT alone holding $66. Morgan Stanley and Charles Schwab are now pushing direct crypto trading into ordinary brokerage accounts.
The driver is that both firms can already see demand within their own client base, with clients executing trades elsewhere. Charles Schwab's clients hold about 20% of US spot crypto exchange-traded products, which helps explain the timing. Demand is already concentrated inside Schwab's franchise, and every trade those clients execute on Coinbase or Robinhood is revenue and behavioral data leaving the brokerage.
Market Dynamics
Morgan Stanley faces the same math as E*Trade's 8. 6 million self-directed clients, who generated 1. 029 million average daily revenue trades in 2025 through a channel holding $1.
67 trillion in assets. The ETF era created a specific problem for both firms, as the products gave clients Bitcoin exposure inside familiar accounts, while spot trading, execution, and account stickiness went elsewhere. A Schwab client who holds IBIT and then trades spot Bitcoin on Coinbase is splitting their financial life in two.
Schwab gets assets under management, and Coinbase gets the trading relationship. An infographic highlights four client metrics, including Schwab's 20% share of U. spot crypto ETPs, showing why both brokerages believe crypto demand already sits inside their platforms.
Market Impact
Why attack now Both firms chose to move while the pure-play crypto model is threatened. Robinhood's first-quarter results show app crypto notional volume down 48% year over year to $24 billion, with crypto revenue down 47%. The infrastructure costs of building a crypto product are fixed regardless of market conditions, but launching into a lull gives compliance, pricing, and service teams time to work out the friction before retail enthusiasm returns at scale.
Incumbents rarely attack pure-play competitors at the peak of a cycle, moving when the window is open. The regulatory environment gave them the runway to build. The FDIC rescinded its prior-approval requirement for permissible crypto activities in March 2025, while the OCC clarified in May 2025 that national banks may buy and sell customer-custodied crypto and outsource execution with proper risk management.
In April 2026, SEC staff followed with an interim statement on broker-dealer registration issues for certain crypto interfaces. The directional shift cleared enough friction to build, even as Congress has work to do regarding the CLARITY Act. What looks like an aggressive 2026 push is the visible end of a multi-quarter infrastructure project.
Crypto markets are watching this development closely as investors weigh its potential impact on prices.




